Diebold v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentWellford, Senior Circuit Judge
Because I am convinced that Judge Charles M. Allen was correct in his memorandum opinion in this case on agency discretion, I would affirm the dismissal of this action. It was brought by two employees of “Logistics, Food Service Division, Fort Knox, Kentucky,” to set aside a decision of the government • agency at Fort Knox to contract food services to a private successful bidder. I dissent from the majority view for a number of reasons.
The substance of the district court’s opinion is set out in the last paragraph:
While the Sixth Circuit has not ruled on this issue, we note the complete…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.