Legal Opinion

Piepgras v. Edmunds

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided October 15, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Henry Piepgras against Walter D. Edmunds and John Hunter, Jr. Defendants demur to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The cause .of action set forth in the complaint, briefly stated, is as follows: One Elizabeth D. De Lancey, by her attorney, the defendant Edmunds, brought suit in ejectment to recover possession of three-fourths part from Piepgras, the plaintiff herein, of certain lands, below high-water mark, at City Island, impleading one John Hunter, the owner of the remaining one-fourth part of said premises, whose attorney was the defendant herein, John Hunter, Jr., and who, in his answer, demanded judgment for the delivery to him- of the possession of the said one-fourth part. The said Piepgras, in his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Day v. . BachNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. De Lancey v. PiepgrasNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Piepgras v. EdmondsThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API