Legal Opinion
Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. Dobry Flour Mills, Inc
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 18, 1953No. 5448PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad, brought this action to recover money they paid to one of their *498employees in settlement of injuries allegedly received due to the negligence of the defendant, Dobry Flour Mills.
The plaintiff alleged that in 1934 its legal predecessor built a spur line on the property of the defendant to provide railroad service necessary in defendant’s business. When this spur line was built the legal predecessor of plaintiff and the defendant entered into a written contract providing among other things that:
“The industry…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rudco Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- The ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- United States v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.