Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Bierkamp

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1914No. 7770PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Denver District Court.—Hon. Harry C. Riddle, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

The plaintiff in error brought this action to rescind a contract for the purchase of five acres of land and water, and to secure the return of that portion of the purchase price then paid, etc., for the alleged reason that the defendant Bierkamp, who sold him the land, refused to comply with the terms of the contract to put it all under irrigation for the season of 1910.

The defendants admit the execution of the contract, deny any refusal to comply therewith, aver that the land was under irrigation by a lateral from the Highline Canal, allege that during negotiations a question arose whether…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Wilson v. New United States Cattle-Ranch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  3. Crampton v. McLaughlin Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Weintz v. HafnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Burge v. Cedar Rapids & Mo. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMillan v. American Suburban Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Evans v. TurneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Newton v. CantySupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API