Legal Opinion

People v. Autorino

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided October 16, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIrving Younger, J.

Due process requires that a citizen accused of misconduct be given fair notice ‘ ‘ of the nature of the charge against him and of the act constituting it ’ (People v. Zambounis, 251 N. Y. 94, 96 [1929].) In this case, the interesting question is presented whether due process is satisfied by a simplified complaint that in its entirety describes the charge as follows: “ Lewd Act. No Pasties GoGo.”

The use of a simplified summons and complaint for nontraffic offenses is permitted by rule X of the Rules of the Criminal Court of the City of New York. (22 NYCRR 2950.10.) The draftsmen of the rule…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. ZambounisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RodmanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1970
  2. Christensen v. LundstenSuffolk County District Court · 2008
  3. People v. Oasis Cabana Spa, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API