People v. Autorino
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtIrving Younger, J.
Due process requires that a citizen accused of misconduct be given fair notice ‘ ‘ of the nature of the charge against him and of the act constituting it ’ (People v. Zambounis, 251 N. Y. 94, 96 [1929].) In this case, the interesting question is presented whether due process is satisfied by a simplified complaint that in its entirety describes the charge as follows: “ Lewd Act. No Pasties GoGo.”
The use of a simplified summons and complaint for nontraffic offenses is permitted by rule X of the Rules of the Criminal Court of the City of New York. (22 NYCRR 2950.10.) The draftsmen of the rule…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. ZambounisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. RodmanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1970
- Christensen v. LundstenSuffolk County District Court · 2008
- People v. Oasis Cabana Spa, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1978