Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Marr

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1911No. 3,586PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. Suit in equity by S. W. Marr against J. Truman Nixon. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WM. H. MUNGER, District Judge.

The parties in this case, on the 20th day of September, 1909, entered into an agreement, by the *914terms oí which Marr agreed to convey to Nixon in fee simple, clear of all incumbrances whatsoever, by a good and sufficient warranty deed, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, in block 4, Hodges’ addition to the city of Tulsa, Okl.; Marr to pay the taxes on lot 4 for the year 1909, and Nixon to pay the taxes for said year on the remaining property, and Marr to have the privilege of keeping a hay barn on the lot until the hay was removed, and to thereafter remove the barn from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Kares v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  3. Stevenson v. LoehrIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Kuhn v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  5. Smith v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Summers v. Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Hunt v. Inner Harbor Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Block v. Citizen Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Rogers v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. State ex rel. Moore v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API