Legal Opinion

Long v. Barnet

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County

Decided December 2, 1929No. 81Published

1Opinion of the Court

Schaeffer, P. J.,

To the scire facias sur mortgage caused to •be issued by the plaintiff, certain defendants claiming as real owners have filed their affidavit of defense. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The only question is whether or not the defendants’ motion for binding instructions should have been granted on the ground that plaintiff’s action is barred by the statute of limitations.

The mortgage, dated and acknowledged on Sept. 4, 1890, was given by Cyrus Barnet, obligor, to Jonathan Klopp, mortgagee, “in trust and for the use of Maria Barnet, the wife of the obligor of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rife v. GeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. Barnett's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  3. Gillan v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Thompson v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Reagle v. ReagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API