Legal Opinion

Hilton v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 25, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMacfarlane, J.

In the year 1881 a judgment was rendered in favor of the city of St. Louis condemning portions of lots 5, 6 and 7 of block 1 of Compton Hill Addition to the city of St. Louis, for the opening of Park avenue, and damages were assessed in favor of the owners in the sum of $1,940.40. On the twenty-seventh of' June, 1884, the city deposited in court the amount so assessed. Plaintiff and defendant, by interpleas, each claim the fund. The claim made to the fund by each is based on the alleged ownership of the land condemned. No claim is made by either party to the land itself, nor is objection made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad v. RombauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Bailey v. WinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Stone v. CorbettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  4. Bobb v. WolffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Blondeau v. SheridanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Price v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Youngson v. BondNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Coleman v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Ballenger v. WindesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Ross v. GatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API