Legal Opinion

Neeley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 15, 2013No. 2D11-6289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LaROSE, Judge.

Raymond Neeley appeals his judgment and sentence after pleading to possession of a controlled substance without a prescription. See § 893.13(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2010). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). The trial court erred in denying Mr. Neeley’s motion to suppress the pills found in his pocket after an illegal. detention and search. Consequently, we reverse.

The undisputed facts appear as follows. Officer Hilton was alerted to a man slumped over in a van in the driveway of a residence. He responded to the site and saw Mr. Neeley slumped behind the wheel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
  3. Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Norman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JORGE AGUILAR v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. State v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API