Legal Opinion

Price v. Groves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brings a representative stockholder’s

action, containing many broad allegations of improper conduct by the defendants as directors. These allegations are mere general statements of alleged wrongdoing unsupported by facts. Standing alone they would not support a complaint. (Gerdes v. Reynolds, 281 N. Y. 180.) Plaintiff admits that he knows of no facts to support these general charges and gives such lack of knowledge *36as the reason why a broad discovery and inspection and an examination before trial should be granted him herein. Such practice involves resort to the so-called “ fishing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Van Aalten v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. Brush v. BrittainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Lifshutz v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Mann v. LukeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API