Legal Opinion

In re Donnelly

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion for Rehearing. The respondents filed a motion for a rehearing of the above case, which motion the court overruled at its session in September, 1883, and then filed the opinion, infra. The facts appear in In re Donnelly, ante, p. 191, et seq.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

In this case counsel representing respondents makes a motion for a rehearing, and in his brief he states, among other things, the following:

“Two questions of law are presented to the court in this proceeding: The first-, has a justice of the peace authority or jurisdiction to hold a preliminary examination as to any crime of which he has jurisdiction to try? Justices of the peace have such jurisdiction as has been conferred upon them by statute. (See constitution, § 9, p. 57, Dassler’s Comp. Law& of 1879.) Before 1869, justices of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. State v. GranvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. State v. McNaughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. State v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Brockway v. WagnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. City of El Dorado v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API