People v. Arendtsz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, Granville Kingsley Arendtsz, appeals from an order denying his Penal Code section 1016.5 1 motion to vacate his nolo contendere plea. Defendant argues, as he did in the trial court, that he should have been advised he would be denied special forms of removal relief such as asylum. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in ruling defendant was properly advised of the immigration consequences of his nolo contendere plea. Accordingly, we affirm the denial order.
II. BACKGROUND
On March 10, 2006, defendant pled nolo contendere to felony sexual…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. Hyung Joon KimCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. TotariCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. Sanmartin PradoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Amended August 11, 2017 Roberto Morales Diaz v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Amended June 15, 2017 Roberto Morales Diaz v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Carmel Financing, LLC v. SchoenmannDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- People v. Amirian CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.