Legal Opinion

Spurling v. Battista

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1977No. Docket 28455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

The law firm of Jaffe, Snider, Raitt, Garratt & Heuer, P. C. (hereinafter referred to as JSRG & H) appeals by right from an order requiring the firm personally to pay $960 in witness fees to the law firm of Greenfield & Koppel-man, P. C. (hereinafter referred to as G & K).

The principal case underlying the present controversy was a contract action initiated in 1972 in which the Spurlings claimed that Silvio Battista had agreed to sell them 10% of Silcor, Inc., and that a $5,000 down payment had been made. On January 23, 1973 Silvio Battista filed a third-party complaint against Joseph Fuger…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Maljak v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Mihailoff v. Meijer, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shouneyia v. ShouneyiaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Eaddy v. Garden City Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Spurling v. BattistaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API