State of Arizona v. James Lee Hess
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioner James Hess seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his successive petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P. In this opinion, we address Hess’s argument that the court erred in rejecting his claim of newly discovered evidence. Hess has raised other issues that do not meet the criteria for publication, see Ariz. R. Sup.Ct. 111(b); Ariz. R.Crim. P. 31.26, which we address in a separate, contemporaneously filed memorandum decision. See Ariz. R. Sup.Ct. 111(h); Ariz. R.Crim. P. 31.26. We will not disturb…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McDaniel v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. PerezArizona Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014