Legal Opinion

Coonradt v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Miami District Court. ActioN of forcible entry and detainer, brought by Campbell against Coonradt. Trial at the May Term, 1880, of the district court, and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

•Brewer, J.:

This case has been to this court before. (22 Kas. 704.) It is an action of forcible entry and detainer. On the first trial in the district court a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was sustained. This ruling was reversed by this court, and the case remanded for a new trial. On this trial plaintiff recovered judgment, and now the defendant alleges error. The facts are substantially as they appeared when the case was here before. Plaintiff, claiming to hold the original title, fenced the lot. Defendant, holding a tax deed, tore the fence down…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CoonradtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Fairbanks v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Doughty v. FunkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Wilson v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Estabrook v. HaterothNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Burdette v. CorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Coonradt v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API