Legal Opinion

Palvadore v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Nacogdoches. Motion to dismiss, for want of good recognizance.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Ch. J.

The recognizance entered into by appellant, is not conditioned as the law directs. The condition should be,' that the appellant appear at the next Term of the District Court, and from Term to Term thereafter, to abide whatever judgment or decree the Supreme Court may render; but in this recognizance, the condition is that he appear at the next Term of the District Court, and there remain from day to day and Term to Term, to answer unto the State of Texas on a *231charge of keeping and exhibiting a monte bank, found at the Fall Term, 1848, of the said Court, and to abide by and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horton v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API