Legal Opinion
Kamargo Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 9, 1988No. 87-1352PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, Kamargo and ten other related corporations (“Kamargo”), seek review of a decision by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) denying their applications for preliminary permits under 16 U.S.C. § 797(f) (1982). The permits Ka-margo sought would have authorized it to study the feasibility of developing currently unlicensed generating capacity at or near eleven separate hydroelectric projects in upstate New York. Those projects are licensed to and operated by intervenor Niagara Mohawk Power…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Atari Games Corporation v. Ralph Oman, Register of CopyrightsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Electric Power Supply Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- City of Fremont v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Oconto Falls v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.