Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Patrick Michael Cooper

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2018No. 2005AP002744-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1 We review, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.33(3), 1 a report filed by Referee Jonathan V. Goodman, recommending the court reinstate the license of Patrick M. Cooper to practice law in Wisconsin, with conditions. The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) did not appeal the referee's recommendation. After careful review of the matter, we agree that Attorney Cooper's license should be reinstated, with conditions. We also agree with the referee that Attorney Cooper should be required to pay the full costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which are $3,828.81 as of December 20, 2017.

¶ 2…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Patrick M. CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Patrick M. CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Patrick M. CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Patrick Michael CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API