Bartlett v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The trial court, in granting summary judgment of dismissal of the plaintiff’s action against the city of Tacoma and the Northern Pacific Railway Company, commented “Maybe the supreme court will think differently.” It does!
The end result may be the same at the conclusion of a jury trial, for a jury may reach the same conclusion as the trial court: That neither defendant failed in any duty owed to the plaintiff which could have prevented the injuries which he sustained. Nevertheless, we are satisfied that there are issues of fact which should be decided by a jury.
The plaintiff had driven his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barton v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Davison v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Overton v. Wenatchee Beebe Orchard Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ruff v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Bodin v. City of StanwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Smith v. Acme Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.