Legal Opinion

People v. Young

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 26, 2005No. 2-03-0865PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Byrne

Defendant, Carl D. Young, petitioned for relief under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 et seq. (West 2002)), alleging that (1) his fully negotiated plea of guilty to criminal drug conspiracy (720 ILCS 570/405.1(a) (West 2000)) was involuntary; and (2) the trial court erred in summarily denying his pro se motion to withdraw his plea. On the State’s motion, the trial court dismissed the petition as untimely and lacking merit. Defendant appeals, arguing that the petition was timely; that he has the right to an evidentiary hearing on his petition; and that his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. CorreaIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. SimpsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ligon v. DohertyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Illinois Prisoner Review BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. People v. McKinneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Rodriguez v. ILLINOIS PRISONER REVIEW BD.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. People v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API