Legal Opinion
Hanna v. Plumer
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 26, 1965No. 171PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
380 U.S. 460 (1965)
HANNA
v.
PLUMER, EXECUTOR.
No. 171.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 21, 1965.
Decided April 26, 1965.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
Albert P. Zabin argued the cause for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. With him on the brief was George Welch.
James J. Fitzpatrick argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Alfred E. LoPresti and James T. Connolly.
2Opinion of the Court · WarrenChief Justice Warren
The question to be decided is whether, in a civil action where the jurisdiction of the United States district court is based upon diversity of citizenship…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited28 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Celestine v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Daewoo Electronics America Inc. v. Opta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Julian III Flores v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019