Legal Opinion
Federal Insurance v. Honeywell, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 28, 1986No. 84 Civ. 9005 (GLG)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge:
In July 1978, defendant Honeywell, Inc. d/b/a Honeywell Protection Services (“Honeywell”) agreed to install, maintain, .and operate an alarm system at the Bronx, New York premises of the Sentry Armoured Courier Corporation (“Sentry”). Sentry paid Honeywell $1,080 for installation and agreed to pay $139 per month for ongoing service. The written contract that both parties executed expressly provides that Honeywell is not an insurer and specifically limits Honeywell’s liability for its “negligent performance or failure to perform” under the contract to one-half…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Kalisch-Jarcho, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Gentile v. Garden City Alarm Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Behr v. HookSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Baidu, Inc. v. Register. Com, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Arell's Fine Jewelers, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.