Legal Opinion

State v. Maness

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1988No. 481A86PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

In his first assignment of error, the defendant contends the trial court erred in granting the State’s motion to consolidate the two offenses for trial. The defendant argues that trying both charges in front of the same jury overwhelmed the jury with evidence against him and prejudiced the jury against him.

N.C.G.S. § 15A-926(a) provides, in pertinent part, “Two or more offenses may be joined . . . for trial when the offenses . . . are based on the same act or transaction or on a series of acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a single scheme or plan.”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  5. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API