Legal Opinion

Tisnado v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1976No. 75-1066PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

In 1967, Tisnado entered guilty pleas to two counts of conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371, arising out of two bank robberies. He was sentenced to two consecutive five-year terms, the federal sentences to commence at the termination of state sentences then in effect.

In 1974, Tisnado brought a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 challenge against the federal sentences, alleging that the two prior state convictions (one in 1967 and the other in 1954) were illegal, that it was therefore improper for the sentencing court to have considered them, and that such improper consideration had resulted in…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith Wayne FREDERICK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Lewis Aaron CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. John David GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Larry James Gamble v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API