Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1984No. 14773PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

We are asked to decide whether the State Industrial Commission erred in holding that Larry L. Smith willfully failed to report a *627material fact in order to obtain unemployment compensation benefits as provided for by I.C. § 72-1366(7), and holding that, for the purposes of Mr. Smith’s eligibility for benefits, the week of January 16,1982, was not a “compensable week” within the meaning of I.C. § 72-1312.

During the time Mr. Smith was receiving unemployment compensation benefits he was employed part-time as an electronics technician at a radio station. When hired, he was paid…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bell v. Idaho Department of LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Bainbridge v. Boise Cascade Plywood MillIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Flynn v. Sun Valley Brewing CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Wittkopf v. Stewart's Firefighter Food Catering, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Bainbridge v. Boise Cascade Plywood MillIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API