Castiel v. Hegenbarth
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BECKER, Judge.
This appeal arises from a denial of a writ of quo warranto. Plaintiff, Jesus Castiel, sought a writ of quo warranto directed to Enrique Hegenbarth, questioning his right to hold the position as a director of the corporation known as C.M.H., Inc.
Plaintiff and defendants, Enrique Hegen-barth and Leffertz Mabie, Jr., formed a corporation known as C.M.H., Inc., under the corporation laws of the State of Louisiana. The articles of incorporation and initial report filed with the Secretary of State named Castiel as the sole incorporator, and Castiel, Mabie and Hegenbarth as the first…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clay v. ClaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Succession of McGuireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Finn v. PonsaaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Dardeau v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- International Stevedores, Inc. v. HanlonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Succession of CostelloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002