Legal Opinion

Harn v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1912No. 3181PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John J. Carney, Judge. Action between Alice Harn and Oklahoma City and others. From order discharging temporary injunction, the party first named brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff in error, upon the ground that this court has no jurisdiction of said cause, for the reason that the order appealed from is one discharging a temporary injunction, and the plaintiff in error has failed to file her petition in error in this court within a time fixed by the trial court, not exceeding 30 days from the date of said order. The motion to dismiss must be sustained.

Section 6093, Comp. Laws 1909 (sec. 5266, Rev. Laws 1910), provides that :

“When an order discharging or…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitchener v. City Com'rs, City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Mounts Oil, Gas & Mineral Co. v. Sandals, Griffin & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Dunlap v. Western Oil Station Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Earnest v. SeranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Cope v. State Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API