Legal Opinion
Kusnier v. Affirm Holdings, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 14, 2025No. 3:22-cv-07770Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARK KUSNIER, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07770-AMO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 9 v. FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 AFFIRM HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 86 Defendants. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the 14 Court’s August 26, 2024 Order dismissing their second amended complaint for failure to 15 sufficiently allege facts supporting a strong inference of scienter. ECF 86 (“Mot.”). To obtain 16 such leave, Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,310, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6865, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,226 in Re Syntex Corp. Securities Litigation. Arthur M. Rosenbaum Richard Gorosh, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated Kenneth Wynne Judy Wynne Robert Younger Jerrald Schaffer Joseph Cocola Rita Cocola Robert K. Greenfield Amy Tresti Alan R. Tresti Steven J. Gutter Carol Morris Nicholas J. Donohue G. King Perry Henry Cole Bori Berkow and Eric Rose v. Syntex Corporation Paul E. Freiman James N. Wilson John Fried Marvyn Carton Allen & Company Incorporated and Thomas GutshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Shaulis v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System v. Align Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.