Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bishop

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 12, 2003No. CR-02-2295PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edward Bishop filed this petition for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Charles R. Malone to reinstate the "not guilty" verdict returned by the jury in this case.

The City of Tuscaloosa ("the City") charged Bishop with driving under the influence of alcohol. On August 24, 2003, his trial began in the circuit court. During a break in the jury deliberations Bishop was seen talking with one of the jurors in his case. The trial court found Bishop in contempt of court and stated that it would set aside the verdict if the jury returned a "not guilty" verdict. The jury returned a verdict of "not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. Loggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Ex Parte ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Ingram v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. State v. EllisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API