Legal Opinion

Satovsky v. Satovsky

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. Docket No. 70Published

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

After reading, carefully, the record, especially the testimony of the plaintiffs, we adopt the opinion of the trial judge.

“The bill of complaint in this cause is filed for specific performance. On the 9th day of May, 1914, Max Satovsky, one of the defendants, purchased the premises described in the bill of complaint from Sarah Austin, under a land contract. On the 25th day of June, 1918, the said defendant Max Satovsky entered into an agreement with Clayton A. Grinnell, one of the defendants herein, to exchange said described real estate with the said Grinnell for a parcel of land located at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beatty v. SweeneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API