Legal Opinion · Dissent

Turtle Island Restoration Network v. United States Department of Commerce

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 27, 2017No. 13-17123Published

1DissentCallahan, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority that the 2012 Biological Opinion (“BiOp”) is not arbitrary and capricious in determining that the Hawaii-based shallow-set fishery expansion would have no appreciable effect on the leatherback sea turtle population, and that the 2012 BiOp adequately considers the impact of global climate change. However, I dissent from the remainder of the majority opinion.

First, the majority errs in rejecting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (“FWS”) issuance of a special purpose permit (the “Permit”) under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) to the National Marine Fisheries…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API