Turtle Island Restoration Network v. United States Department of Commerce
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentCallahan, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority that the 2012 Biological Opinion (“BiOp”) is not arbitrary and capricious in determining that the Hawaii-based shallow-set fishery expansion would have no appreciable effect on the leatherback sea turtle population, and that the 2012 BiOp adequately considers the impact of global climate change. However, I dissent from the remainder of the majority opinion.
First, the majority errs in rejecting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (“FWS”) issuance of a special purpose permit (the “Permit”) under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) to the National Marine Fisheries…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.