Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Elizabeth Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1941No. Appeal, 101PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Schaffer.

The County of Allegheny, apparently without any authority from the Borough of Elizabeth, resurfaced part of Third Street in the borough, by applying an asphalt top coating, from four to six inches deep to the brick paving already there. The effect of this was to raise the grade of the street in front of appellees’ prop erty, with the result, when heavy rains occurred, that their property was flooded and damaged. Not only did the constituted authorities of the borough voice no objection to the improvement, but supplemented the work by providing a drain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deer v. Sheraden BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Robinson v. Norwood BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Kunkle v. Ford City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Nether Providence TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Condemnation of the Land & Property JacobsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Messinger v. Washington TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Bleman v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1966
  5. Commonwealth v. GwilliamCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API