Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Geo. W. Bush & Sons Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1925No. Appeal, 279PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiffs, consignees of a shipment of merchandise transported by defendant, a common carrier, brought this action to recover the value of the goods which defendant failed to deliver to them. The trial of the case resulted in a verdict and judgment for defendant; plaintiffs appealed.

In the view we take of the record, an elaboration of the facts is not necessary, it being sufficient to say that the merchandise was delivered by defendant to a third person on a forged order therefor. “Whatever doubt may hang over other questions as to the termination of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shenk v. Philadelphia Steam Propeller Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  2. Wernwag & Dawson v. Phil., W. & B. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  3. Stone & Co. v. D., L. & W. R. R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. Crystal v. The Cunard Steam-Ship Co. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Sheehan v. American Railway Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Utley v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API