Jones v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Plaintiff, George Jones, appearing pro se, seeks a tax refund totaling $21,562.36 for tax years 1977, 1978, and 1979. Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Claims Court, defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, defendant is correct and the court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss.
Frequently, Congress drafts into law specific time limitations that control a person’s right to bring suit against the United States to recover money. Under these laws, often referred to as statutes of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- A. H. Kelson and Nyla C. Kelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Robert J. And Nancy J. Huettl v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Ragan-Malone Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pacetti v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Byrne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- George Jones v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Burson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Peppers v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.