Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Auth.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 23, 1998No. 1-98-1956PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
707 N.E.2d 140 (1998)
302 Ill. App.3d 573
236 Ill.Dec. 295
Catherine WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN PIER AND EXPOSITION AUTHORITY, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 1-98-1956.
Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division.
December 23, 1998.
Joseph R. Curcio, Ltd., Chicago (Joseph R. Curcio; Lisa R. Curcio, of counsel), for Appellant.
Kilgallon & Carlson, Chicago (Michael B. Kilgallon, of counsel), for Appellee.
2Opinion of the Court · CerdaJustice Cerda
The issue in this case is whether Navy Pier in Chicago is recreational property within the meaning of section 3-106 of the Local Government and…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Golla v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Bubb v. Springfield School District 186Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Ozuk v. River Grove Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Batson v. Pinckneyville Elementary School District No. 50Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Doris Diamond v. Springfield Metropolitan Exposition Auditorium AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Jackson Ex Rel. Essien v. Unified School District 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Adamczyk v. Township High School District 214Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Kayser v. Village of WarrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Rexroad v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Rexroad v. City of Springfield Map in appendix added - Aug. 1, 2002Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.