Legal Opinion

M.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 14, 2016No. 5D15-3307PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBerger, J.

M.J., a juvenile, appeals the trial court’s order finding him in direct criminal contempt and sentencing him to serve three days in secure detention for using his cell phone to photograph or film the proceedings in violation of courtroom policy. Because the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that M.J. was filming or taking pictures in the courtroom, we reverse.

Direct criminal contempt is governed by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 and, when a juvenile is the contemnor, Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.150. The rules permit the trial court to summarily…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pugliese v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Krueger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Knorr v. KnorrDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Schenck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Berman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Neil Joseph Gillespie v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API