Newman v. Shore
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DURDEN, WILLIAM L., Associate-Judge.
The appellants were the makers of three separate checks payable to the order of Samuel Ross and Frances (Lurvey) Ross to-talling $3,450.00. Samuel Ross and Frances-(Lurvey) Ross were at all times material hereto husband and wife. The purpose for the execution and delivery of the checks-was to lend this amount to Mr. and Mrs-Ross. In return the appellants were to receive promissory notes from the payees.
The facts clearly establish that Frances-(Lurvey) Ross never endorsed any one of the three checks and further that she did not execute the notes which were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bailey v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- English v. EnglishSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Newman v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Rader v. First Nat. Bank in Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
- Glasser v. Columbia Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hastings v. DemmingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Lago v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017