Legal Opinion

Newman v. Shore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 9, 1968No. Nos. 66-866—66-868PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURDEN, WILLIAM L., Associate-Judge.

The appellants were the makers of three separate checks payable to the order of Samuel Ross and Frances (Lurvey) Ross to-talling $3,450.00. Samuel Ross and Frances-(Lurvey) Ross were at all times material hereto husband and wife. The purpose for the execution and delivery of the checks-was to lend this amount to Mr. and Mrs-Ross. In return the appellants were to receive promissory notes from the payees.

The facts clearly establish that Frances-(Lurvey) Ross never endorsed any one of the three checks and further that she did not execute the notes which were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. English v. EnglishSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  3. Newman v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Rader v. First Nat. Bank in Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  5. Glasser v. Columbia Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hastings v. DemmingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Lago v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API