Sperling v. Board of Review
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’Hern, J.
I concur with Justice Stein’s understanding of the limited breadth of the Court’s judgment. Ante at 469, 720 A.2d at 608.
I
One who suffers an injury between work and everyday affairs may seek temporary disability benefits while recovering from the injury under either the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1 to -128 (comp), or the Temporary Disability Benefits Law, N.J.S.A. 43:21-25 to -56 (benefits law). If a workers’ compensation carrier denies coverage on the basis that the injury is not work related, a claimant may commence an action immediately to receive benefits under the benefits…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Cafferata v. PeyserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- New Jersey Highway Authority v. RennerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. VassasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.