Legal Opinion

Sperling v. Board of Review

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 11, 1998Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’Hern, J.

I concur with Justice Stein’s understanding of the limited breadth of the Court’s judgment. Ante at 469, 720 A.2d at 608.

I

One who suffers an injury between work and everyday affairs may seek temporary disability benefits while recovering from the injury under either the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1 to -128 (comp), or the Temporary Disability Benefits Law, N.J.S.A. 43:21-25 to -56 (benefits law). If a workers’ compensation carrier denies coverage on the basis that the injury is not work related, a claimant may commence an action immediately to receive benefits under the benefits…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  2. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Cafferata v. PeyserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. New Jersey Highway Authority v. RennerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. VassasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API