Legal Opinion

State v. McKinney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 30, 1972No. 19445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Malcolm McKinney, the appellant herein, was convicted in the Spartanburg County Court of an assault of a high and aggravated nature. During the course of the trial certain testimony was admitted over the objection of his counsel. Thereafter, counsel for the appellant cross-examined the witness thereabout without reserving the objection previously made. The objection was thereby lost and if any error had been committed in the admission of the testimony it was cured. State v. Smith, 245 S. C. 59, 138 S. E. (2d) 705; State v. Motley, 251 S. C. 568, 164 S. E. (2d) 569, and State v. Lee, 255 S. C.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MotleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKinney v. WalkerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  2. McKinney v. WalkerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. Lance Antonio BrewtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API