Legal Opinion
Forbes v. Crosby
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 24, 2004No. 1D03-3179PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
866 So.2d 198 (2004)
Everitte L. FORBES, Petitioner,
v.
James V. CROSBY, Jr., Secretary, Department of Corrections, Respondent.
No. 1D03-3179.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
February 24, 2004.
Everitte L. Forbes, pro se, petitioner.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Sean F. Callaghan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.
2Per curiam
A Department of Corrections disciplinary team found Everitte L. Forbes guilty of lying to staff and imposed a penalty of forfeiture of 60 days of gain time. After exhausting his administrative remedies, Forbes filed a petition for writ of…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Bard v. WolsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Stacey v. DEPARTMENT OF PRO. REG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Raia v. RaiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
4Cited by4 opinions
- Wilkinson v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Bango v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- United Auto. Ins. Co. v. MIAMI MED. GROUPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Parramore v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006