California Industrial Facilities Resources, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
In this preaward bid protest, plaintiff challenges a request for quotations (“RFQ”), and the proposed award of a delivery order arising from the RFQ, as exceeding the scope of the underlying indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts. The parties have filed cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies plaintiffs motion and grants defendant’s and defendant-intervenor’s motions.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Special Operational Equipment Tailored Vendor Logistics Support Program
Plaintiff is a manufacturer of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lawrence Battelle, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Golden Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Ian, Evan & Alexander Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Igniteaction LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
- National Government Services, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018