Legal Opinion

California Industrial Facilities Resources, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 7, 2012No. 12-148CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

In this preaward bid protest, plaintiff challenges a request for quotations (“RFQ”), and the proposed award of a delivery order arising from the RFQ, as exceeding the scope of the underlying indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts. The parties have filed cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies plaintiffs motion and grants defendant’s and defendant-intervenor’s motions.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Special Operational Equipment Tailored Vendor Logistics Support Program

Plaintiff is a manufacturer of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawrence Battelle, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Golden Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Ian, Evan & Alexander Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. Igniteaction LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
  5. National Government Services, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API