Legal Opinion

Claim of Harrigan v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1956Published

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, P. J.

This appeal, taken by an unsuccessful claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, presents the issue of whether claimant was still engaged in the course of his employment when he was accidently injured.

Claimant was employed as an assistant train dispatcher. He worked in the office of the dispatcher at the north end of the north bound “ C ” platform of the I. it. T. 96th Street and Broadway subway station in New York City. The office was on a level with the subway station platform.

Claimant’s hours of duty were from 4:00 p.m. until midnight. The accident occurred a few moments…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Matter of Lynch v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Claim of Manville v. New York State Department of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Claim of Gillette v. Rochester Vulcanite Paving Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  5. Schwartz v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API