Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Mapp

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1957No. 36864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

The contention is made, and was made in the appeal to the superior court, that the award of the full board, which was affirmed by the superior court, is contrary to law because it was not concurred in by two members of such board. As shown in the foregoing statement of fact the award was issued on May 1, 1957, and signed by Director W. E. Buckner, that Arlie D. Tucker concurred in such award, and that Richard W. Best dissented.

“The courts of this State are bound to take judicial notice of who are the public officers of the State holding under commissions issued by the Governor.” Marshall v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. McCain v. BonnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Hayslip v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. Marshall v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Rockwell International Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Lowe v. LindseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  3. Atlanta General Tires, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Atlanta General Tires, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API