Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lustik v. Rankila

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1964No. 39121Published

1DissentThomas Gallagher, Justice

Shortly after the accident and while Mary Jane Lustik was still hospitalized therefrom, the action for death by wrongful act under Minn. St. 573.021 was commenced against her. Attorneys representing her automobile liability insurer took over the defense of this action and remained in complete charge of it throughout. No counterclaim on her behalf could be interposed therein because plaintiff-*525trustee there did not appear as personal representative of the estate of Ruth Rankila under § 573.01.2

Upon her release from the hospital, the present action for injuries sustained in the accident was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gammel v. Ernst & ErnstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. TePoel v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Bunge v. YagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Lambach v. Northwestern Refining Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Myhra v. ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API