In Re Gole

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

Today we suspend the respondent, Richard A. Gole, from the practice of law for making improper sexual comments to, and inquiries of, two female clients.

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission has charged respondent Gole with two counts of violating Ind.Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(d), which prohibits attorneys from engaging in “conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.” The respondent and the Commission have submitted a Conditional Agreement for Discipline to resolve these charges. As a result of our approval of that agreement pursuant to…