Legal Opinion

Ryerson v. Hemar Insurance Corp. of America

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2006No. ED 86421PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKER T. SHAW, Judge.

Joy Ryerson, co-signer of a promissory note (“Co-signor”) on behalf of Patricia Ryerson (“Borrower”), appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and award of damages in favor of Hemar Insurance Corporation of America (“Assign-ee”) for Co-signer’s default on the promissory note. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

This is the second time this case has been before this Court. In Hemar Ins. Corp. of America v. Ryerson, 108 S.W.3d 90 (Mo.App. E.D.2003) (“Hemar I”), the trial court dismissed Assignee’s petition to enforce a promissory note against Co-signer because…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Sabine v. LeonardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Hemar Insurance Corp. of America v. RyersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Estell v. Estate of IdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Casper v. Estate of BellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mary M. Harms v. Gregory R. HarmsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Shawnee Bend Development Co. v. Lake Region Water & Sewer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Jensen v. United States Tennis AssociationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  4. Sally Bacon v. Jeffrey FriedmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API