Legal Opinion

Farmers National Bank v. Backus

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1896No. Nos. 10,166—(173)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant Burdic from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Charles D. Kerr, J., denying his application to discharge the receiver and to compel him to account, and directing appellant to deliver possession of the premises to the receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This case has already been twice before this court. 63 Minn. 115, 65 N. W. 255, and 64 Minn. 43, 66 N. W. 5. After we held that the effect of a supersedeas bond on appeal was to suspend the power of the receiver pending the appeal, the receiver surrendered the possession of the mortgaged premises to Burdic, the grantee of Backus, the mortgagor, who resumed the collection of the rents. After we affirmed the order of the court appointing a receiver pendente lite to collect the rents of the mortgaged premises, the plaintiff moved the court below for an order requiring Burdic to restore…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farmers' National Bank v. BackusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Farmers National Bank v. BackusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Esch v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API