Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Harrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 4, 1965No. F-127PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLS, Judge.

The plaintiff, who suffered severe bodily injuries in an automobile accident, appeals from a final judgment for defendants entered pursuant to a directed verdict in this negligence action.

Plaintiff’s sole point going to the merits of the cause questions the propriety of the *634action of the trial judge in granting the directed verdict, it being her contention that she presented an issue of negligence that should have been resolved by the jury rather than by the actions of the trial judge in directing a verdict as a matter of law.

The pertinent facts are:

At about 4:45 P.M. on the day…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Budgen v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Crews v. WarrenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Chilton v. DockstaderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Burkett v. Belk-Lindsey Co. of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. Gertler v. PetersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John B. Reid & Associates, Inc. v. JimenezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. McGriff v. Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API