Locke v. Farley

Defendants in error recovered judgment before a justice and the circuit court affirmed it on certiorari, and a reversal of both judgments is now sought *406on writ of error. The action was brought on an account for goods alleged to have been sold and delivered to Locke by the defendants in error as a partnership under the name of Farley, Hawey & Co.

The summons was issued August 11th, and had attached to it a copy of the account in question, with an affidavit of one of the defendants in error that it was “a true account of the indebtedness of C. IT. Locke of Detroit, Michigan, to said firm.” It…