Legal Opinion

Tomasko v. DuBuc

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 15, 2000No. 98-836PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDallanis, J.

The plaintiff, Edith L. Tomasko, appeals from an order of the Superior Court {Lynn, J.) denying her post-divorce petition seeking court approval to relocate to Montana with the two minor children from her marriage to the defendant, Vincent E. DuBuc. We affirm.

The parties were married in 1978 and divorced in 1992. They have two children, a daughter and son, who, at the time of the initial hearing were thirteen and eleven respectively. Both parties were represented by counsel when they entered into a stipulation that was incorporated into the final divorce decree.

The stipulation provided that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re HeinrichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. In re LockabySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. In re PfeufferSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. In Re HeinrichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. In Re HeinrichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API